A few areas of agreement, a few of disagreement.

You suggest that, “The personal Q1 experience is completely shaped by the Q3 ocean.”

I disagree, at least in the manner you have defined it.

Your definition of the Q3 ocean: the quadrant of language, culture, value systems and worldviews.

My Q1 experience includes premonitions and being guided. Before I recognized what was happening in my Q1 experience, I didn’t believe those kinds of experiences were real. It took me years to figure out the language for them, and I use one term I've never heard anyone use.

You suggest that, “ As Wittgenstein once wrote: the limits of my language mean the limits of my world.”

I disagree. I’ve been in many abusive situations throughout my life, I didn’t have the language for them, and they occurred anyway. If I had the language, I believe I would have addressed them sooner. But I believe guidance occurs, so I couldn’t know what they meant until the world had shifted in ways that would allow me to move, and realize exactly that: I couldn’t know/move until the time was right, and in that process opportunities and extraordinary events occurred that I could have never imagined.

I agree with this: “Everyone has their way of seeing things.”

But I don’t agree with this: “and they have to explain why that way is the most important way.” Because IMHO there isn’t one most important way.

You say, “We can see how each quadrant can reduce the world to their little section of reality,” in a manner that suggests this is a “bad” thing. I disagree. I think that’s the direction we need to go.

The way I see it is like this:

Person A experiences M-X-Y.

Person B experiences L-X-Y.

We can agree on the importance of X & Y, but Person A shouldn’t outright dismiss Person B’s experience of L, because they’ve experienced M.

I am just beginning to work on an essay, which revolves around the relevance of the term, reality, so my perspectives may evolve a bit more as I work through that.